The Cosmo Energy Group has established material issues as the priority challenges to be addressed in pursuing the Group’s future growth and fulfilling its vision.
In fiscal 2025, as part of the process of developing our new Eighth Consolidated Medium-Term Management Plan, which will launch in fiscal 2026, we reassessed our material issues in light of the increasing complexity of social challenges and changes in the business environment. Focusing on aligning our business strategy with social demands, including stakeholder expectations, we revised our material issues into six priority issues to highlight the key challenges for achieving sustainable value creation and enhancing enterprise value over the medium and long term.
Vision for Addressing Material Issues
Risks and Opportunities, Key KPIs, and Contributing SDGs of Materiality
| Material issues | Vision | Risks and Opportunities | Major KPIs | Related SDGs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safe operations and stable supply |
|
Risks
|
|
![]() |
Opportunities
|
||||
| Contributing to a carbon-neutral society |
|
Risks
|
|
![]() |
Opportunities
|
||||
| Sustainable growth strategy |
|
Risks
|
|
![]() |
Opportunities
|
||||
| Employee engagement and development |
|
Risks
|
|
![]() |
Opportunities
|
||||
| Strengthening risk resilience |
|
Risks
|
|
- |
Opportunities
|
||||
| Strengthening governance |
|
Risks
|
|
![]() |
Opportunities
|
Material Issue Identification Process
We sought the opinions of both internal and external stakeholders in the process of identifying the Group’s material issues. After comprehensively identifying medium- to long-term social challenges, management and staff from relevant departments selected the key challenges. After incorporating external input and verifying their validity, we identified material issues.
First, we drew on items recommended or required for disclosure under widely referenced sustainability disclosure standards and guidelines such as GRI, CSRD, and SASB, identifying potential issues. These were then consolidated and refined into a candidate list of 36 material issues.
In selecting the key challenges, we evaluated each social issue along two axes — “the magnitude of the Group’s impact on the environment and society” and “the magnitude of the financial impact on the Group” — based on interviews with senior management and discussions among staff from relevant departments, and then selected the issues of particular importance.
To evaluate their validity, we checked the appropriateness of the selected key challenges by consulting with external experts and deliberating among senior management. The six material issues identified through this process were then approved by a resolution of the Board of Directors.
Materiality Formulation Process
STEP 1 Identifying medium- to long-term social challenges
Comprehensively identify social challenges relevant to management based on items recommended or required for disclosure under widely referenced sustainability disclosure standards and guidelines such as GRI, CSRD, and SASB
STEP 2 Selecting key social challenges
Assess the importance of each social issue through interviews with senior management and discussions among staff from relevant departments, and select the issues of particular importance

Key challenges are identified by assessing each social issue along two axes: “the magnitude of the Group’s impact on the environment and society” and “the magnitude of the financial impact on the Group”
STEP 3 Evaluating validity
Check the appropriateness of the selected key challenges through consultations with external experts and deliberations among senior management, and make revisions as necessary
STEP 4 Finalizing and disclosing material issues
Finalize the material issues and disclose them clearly to internal and external stakeholders through various communication channels



